What Is Proctozone Hc 2.5 Cream Used for

Abstract

Recently, carbon dioxide capture and conversion, along with hydrogen from renewable resources, provide an alternative approach to synthesis of useful fuels and chemicals. People are increasingly interested in developing innovative carbon dioxide hydrogenation catalysts, and the pace of progress in this area is accelerating. Accordingly, this perspective presents current state of the art and outlook in synthesis of light olefins, dimethyl ether, liquid fuels, and alcohols through two leading hydrogenation mechanisms: methanol reaction and Fischer-Tropsch based carbon dioxide hydrogenation. The future research directions for developing new heterogeneous catalysts with transformational technologies, including 3D printing and artificial intelligence, are provided.

Introduction

Capturing carbon dioxide (CO₂) has emerged as an important method of mitigating its impact on environment^1,2,3,4,5. However, this introduces the challenge of utilizing a large volume of captured CO₂, which previously has not had any industrially viable uses at such a large scale. Realizing that, historically, fossil resources were produced via natural carbon-hydrogenation during photosynthesis, synthetic CO₂ hydrogenation is likely the best way to regenerate combusted hydrocarbons.

While CO₂ hydrogenation is challenging due to the thermal stability of CO₂, making reaction conversions low, considerable progress has been made towards converting CO₂ to single carbon (C₁) products (e.g., formic acid, carbon monoxide (CO), methane, and methanol) through direct hydrogen reduction or hydrothermal-chemical reduction in water^{6,7,8,9,10,11}. Thermocatalytic hydrogenation of CO₂ to methane can be achieved easily at atmospheric pressure and high gas hourly space velocity (GHSV), and has been shown to achieve CO₂ conversion and CH₄ selectivity close to theoretical equilibrium values¹². Hydrogenation to CO can be performed via the reverse water gas shift (RWGS) reaction. CO₂-to-methanol (CTM) (CH₃OH and MeOH) has already been industrialized in Reykjavik, Iceland using heterogeneous catalysis and geothermal energy¹³.

In addition, catalysis for CO₂ hydrogenation to C₁ products has been widely studied with considerable progress¹⁴. Recently, significant progress has been achieved in heterogeneous catalytic hydrogenation of CO₂ to various high-value and easily marketable fuels and chemicals containing two or more carbons (C₂₊ species), including dimethyl ether (DME)¹⁵, olefins¹⁶, liquid fuels¹⁷, and higher alcohols¹⁸. Compared to C₁ products, C₂₊ product synthesis is more challenging due to the extreme inertness of CO₂ and the high C–C coupling barrier, as well as many competing reactions leading to the formation of C₁ products. However, C₂₊ hydrocarbons and oxygenates possess higher economic values and energy densities than C₁ compounds. Therefore, this perspective mainly focuses on heterogeneous catalysis for CO₂ hydrogenation to high-value C₂₊ products.

Many reviews of heterogeneous catalytic hydrogenation of CO₂ have been published, organized according to using several approaches, including thermal, electrochemical, and photochemical hydrogenation¹⁹; homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts²⁰; and by their respective product distributions or catalysts employed^{14,21,22,23,24}. Some are limited to C₁ products (e.g., methane or methanol)^14,25. However, perspectives on heterogeneous catalytic CO₂ hydrogenation to C₂₊ products are needed to guide scientists working in this area. Thus, this work is designed to help fill this gap and is organized to emphasize reaction mechanisms for producing C₂₊ materials.

The hydrogenation of CO₂ to C₂₊ products mainly occurs via a methanol-mediated route or a CO₂ modified Fischer–Tropsch mechanism^17,26. There are a variety of questions that need to be answered for each of these reaction mechanisms: what kinds of catalysts are beneficial for each route? How do the catalysts regulate product selectivity? What can be done to further enhance catalytic performance? What is the central challenge with catalysts for CO₂ hydrogenation to C₂₊ products? To answer these questions, the catalysts for CO₂ hydrogenation to C₂₊ species will be discussed based on the methanol-mediated route and the CO₂ modified Fischer–Tropsch route. Some experimental guidelines are provided to improve CO₂ conversion and to reduce C₁ byproducts. In addition, an outlook of transformational technologies for developing new catalysts is given in this work. Artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to guide the design and discovery of catalysis^27,28, while 3D printing technologies are anticipated to be used to manufacture them on a large scale²⁹.

Methanol reaction based CO₂ hydrogenation

Methanol (CH₃OH) reaction based CO₂ hydrogenation can be realized by coupling two sequential reactions over a bifunctional catalyst. First, CO₂ and H₂ are converted to CH₃OH over a partially reduced oxide surface (e.g., Cu, In, and Zn) or noble metals via a CO or formate pathway. Then, methanol is dehydrated or coupled over zeolites or alumina. Accordingly, bifunctional or hybrid catalysts are composed of a CH₃OH synthesis catalyst and a CH₃OH dehydration/coupling catalyst, which can convert CO₂ into high-value C₂₊ compounds, including DME, hydrocarbons like gasoline, and light olefins. An efficient catalyst for these high-value C₂₊ products should be active for both CH₃OH synthesis and dehydration/coupling under the same conditions (Fig. 1a, R1–R4).

$${\mathrm{CO}}_2 + 3{\mathrm{H}}_2 \to {\mathrm{CH}}_3{\mathrm{OH}} + {\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}}$$

(R1)

$$2{\mathrm{CH}}_3{\mathrm{OH}} \to {\mathrm{CH}}_3{\mathrm{OCH}}_3 + {\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}}$$

(R2)

$${n}{\mathrm{CH}}_3{\mathrm{OH}} + {\mathrm{H}}_2 \to {\mathrm{CH}}_3\left( {{\mathrm{CH}}_2} \right)_{n - 2}{\mathrm{CH}}_3 + {{n}\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}}$$

(R3)

$${n}{\mathrm{CH}}_3{\mathrm{OH}} \to {\mathrm{CH}}_2 = {\mathrm{CH}}\left( {{\mathrm{CH}}_2} \right)_{n - 3}{\mathrm{CH}}_3 + {{n}\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}}$$

(R4)

In CO₂ hydrogenation to C₂₊ compounds, the reactions of CO₂ to CH₃OH and CH₃OH to C₂₊ compounds take place at 200–300 °C and 400 °C, respectively, over bifunctional catalysts. Therefore, investigation of the reaction conditions, catalyst properties, and catalytic performance for CO₂ to CH₃OH and CH₃OH to C₂₊ products is necessary.

Methanol

As mentioned earlier, one of the possible targets of CO₂ hydrogenation is to convert CO₂ to CH₃OH. Significant progress has been made in this area recently, especially in developing copper (Cu)- and indium (In)-based catalysts^30,31. Recent publications have dealt with Cu–ZnO composites, whose CH₃OH selectivity ranges from 30 to 70% at CO₂ conversions less than 30% under typical reaction conditions (temperature: 220–300 °C, pressure <5 MPa, H₂/CO₂ = 3)^32,33. By increasing the pressure to 36 MPa and H₂/CO₂ molar ratio to 10, the single pass CO₂ conversion can be increased to 95.3% with 98.2% methanol selectivity over a Cu–ZnO–Al₂O₃ catalyst³⁴. When Cu nanoparticles (NPs) are encapsulated in metal organic frameworks (MOFs) and strongly interact with their secondary structural units, the resultant metal NPs@MOFs (e.g., Cu⊂ UiO-66³⁵ and CuZn@UiO-bpy³⁶) show enhanced activity and 100% CH₃OH selectivity, while preventing the agglomeration of the Cu NPs. In addition, ZrO₂ is a noted promoter or support in Cu-based catalysts for CTM hydrogenation^37,38.

Indium-based materials have shown promise as alternatives for CO₂ conversion to methanol. Pure In₂O₃ can convert 7.1% of CO₂ with 39.7% selectivity to CH₃OH at 330 °C and 5 MPa³⁹. A Pd/In₂O₃ catalyst with many interfacial sites and oxygen vacancies enhances CO₂ adsorption, achieving CO₂ conversions of above 20% with a methanol space time yield (STY) of 0.89 g_MeOH g_cat ⁻¹ h⁻¹ at 300 °C and 5 MPa³¹. In₂O₃/ZrO₂ catalysts significantly boost the methanol selectivity to 99.8%, with a CO₂ conversion of 5.2% and long-term stability of 1000 h under industrially relevant conditions⁴⁰. Besides the Cu and In-based catalysts, great progress has also been achieved with ZnO–ZrO₂ solid solution catalysts, as well as Pd/Pt-based catalysts^41,42,43. The ZnO–ZrO₂ solid solution catalysts have achieved CH₃OH selectivities of 86–91% under a GHSV of 24,000 mL g⁻¹ h⁻¹ with high thermal stability after being tested for more than 500 h; it also shows a strong resistance to sulfur-containing molecules³¹. In 2014, Norskov's group reported a Ni–Ga bimetallic catalyst for CO₂ hydrogenation to CH₃OH at 0.1 MPa, whose STY reached 0.64 g_MeOH g_cat ⁻¹ h⁻¹ at 210 °C⁴⁴. Subsequently, a series of noble metal based catalysts, such as Ga–Pd⁴⁵, Au–CeO_X/TiO₂ ⁴⁶, and Pt–MoO_X/Co-TiO₂ ⁴⁷, were developed to convert CO₂ to CH₃OH at low pressure or low temperature. Similarly, Fan's group achieved low-pressure CH₃OH synthesis via another series of multiple-metal catalysts that included In₂O₃, like Ni–In–Al/SiO₂ and La–Ni–In–Al/SiO₂, starting with a phyllosilicate precursor^3,48, and achieving CH₃OH STYs of above 0.011 g_MeOH g_cat ⁻¹ h⁻¹ at 255 °C and 0.1 MPa.

Dimethyl ether (DME)

There has been rapid development in DME synthesis from CO₂ hydrogenation using CH₃OH synthesis catalysts hybridized with CH₃OH coupling catalysts¹⁵. The effect of promoters, supports, and synthesis conditions have been explored^42,43,49. For example, the acidic sites on γ-alumina surfaces and the CuAl₂O₄ spinel phase can be regulated by promoters like gallium or zinc oxides, resulting in higher stability for Cu NPs during CO₂-to-DME⁴⁹. To date, CO₂ conversion and DME selectivity mostly vary between 35–80% and 5–50%, respectively¹⁵, but CO₂ conversion can reach up to 97% at 280 °C over a Cu–Zn–Al/HZSM-5 catalyst by drastically increasing the reaction pressure (to 36 MPa)³⁴. In addition, interesting results have been reported on core–shell structured hybrid catalysts with the MeOH synthesis catalysts at the core and the MeOH dehydration catalysts forming the shell^50,51. Compared with traditional hybrid catalysts prepared by physically mixing the components, these novel core–shell catalysts have received much attention in the literature due to their unique structures and ability to valorize CO₂ by improving conversion and DME selectivity.

Light olefins, aromatics, and gasoline

MeOH can not only be dehydrated to DME, but also serve as an intermediate to synthesize hydrocarbon chains, (CH₂)_n, and final products, such as olefins, aromatics, and gasoline. As mentioned above, defective indium oxide (In₂O₃) with oxygen vacancies is shown to be effective for CO₂ hydrogenation to CH₃OH, while In₂O₃ mixed with SAPO-34 is attractive for efficient CO₂ conversion to CH₃OH and subsequent selective C–C coupling of CH₃OH to form light olefins⁵². The addition of Zr into In₂O₃ is helpful for creating more oxygen vacancies, enhancing CO₂ chemisorption and stabilizing both surface intermediates and active In NPs^53,54. Similarly, a high yield of light olefins can also be achieved by composite catalysts, such as ZnZrO¹⁶, ZnGaO⁵⁵, and CuZnZr⁵⁶ mixed with SAPO-34. As shown in Table 1 (Entries 1–5, 9–13), the selectivity of light olefins, represented by the C₂–C₄ ⁼ column in the table, can be as high as 90%, while the CH₄ selectivity is less than 5% of the hydrocarbon products with 15–30% CO₂ conversions over most bifunctional catalysts tested, which deviates from the Anderson–Schulz–Flory (ASF) distribution.^52,54 This result is a significant breakthrough in the synthesis of light olefins. When the zeolite is changed from SAPO-34 to HZSM-5, more C₅₊ compounds are produced than light olefins. A 78.6% selectivity of gasoline-range hydrocarbons, with only 1% CH₄ selectivity, was obtained from the tandem In₂O₃/HZSM-5 catalyst²⁶. When In₂O₃ is replaced by ZnAlO_x or ZnZrO, CH₃OH is synthesized on the metal oxide surface and then converted to olefins and aromatics inside the HZSM-5 pores with an aromatic selectivity of 73%, which is attributed to a shielding of the external Brønsted acid sites of HZSM-5 by ZnAlO_x ⁵⁷. Therefore, the type of product is affected by both the character of the metal oxides and the geometries of the zeolites that determine the confinement of the hydrocarbons. Furthermore, as mentioned previously, catalysts with product yields exceeding the ASF distribution limit were recently reported that follow the methanol reaction mechanism-based CO/CO₂ hydrogenation. However, fundamental understanding of this ASF distribution deviation is still lacking. Jiao et al.⁵⁸ observed that ketene (CH₂CO) can be formed from the reaction between surface CO and CH₂ species, blocking the surface polymerization, and thus breaking the ASF distribution. Another important reason suggested for the reported ASF distribution deviation is the use of bifunctional catalysts with two types of active sites.

Table 1 Representative catalysts and their performance for hydrogenation of CO₂ to C₂₊ species.

Full size table

Reaction mechanisms

For most catalysts, the rate-determining step for methanol synthesis is CO₂ activation (R1)^59,60, which includes chemisorption of CO₂ and electron transfer from the catalyst to CO₂ ^11,61. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations have shown that different catalysts activate CO₂ through electron transfer between different orbitals⁶². For example, in PtCo-based catalysts, carbon in the CO₂ tends to bind to the Pt sites with an η¹-C_Pt bonding mode, while the O in the CO₂ prefer to combine with the reduced M^δ+ cations in metal oxides with η¹-OM^δ+ configuration⁶³. In addition, oxygen vacancies on metal oxide surfaces and Lewis acid sites have also been shown to enhance CO₂ activation^37,55, stabilize intermediates⁶⁴, and reduce sintering⁵². DFT calculations reveal that an oxygen-defective surface could be created through direct thermal desorption or exposure to a reducing agent⁵⁴. After activation, CO₂ proceeds to form methanol, most likely via a formate intermediated pathway.

The use of DFT and ab initio molecular dynamics sampling techniques on Cu–ZnO³², Cu–Pd^42,65, In⁶⁶, and Ga^48,67 catalysts suggest that methanol synthesis occurs via a formate intermediate (See Fig. 1b). However, while calculations for Cu–ZnO interfacial sites suggest a formate intermediate³², calculations for the near surface regions suggest a CO intermediated pathway⁶⁸. In addition, the calculations indicate that H₂O produced in situ from both RWGS and CH₃OH formation on Pd incorporated Cu catalysts accelerates CO₂ conversion to methanol by reducing the kinetic barriers by 0.2–0.7 eV for O–H bond formation steps^42,65. On In-based catalysts, defective In₂O₃ surfaces have different CO₂ activation barriers⁶⁶. The synthesized methanol can then be transformed into high-value C₂₊ compounds, including DME, lower hydrocarbons, and gasoline via the hydrocarbon-pool mechanism in which an organic center is trapped in the zeolite pores and acts as a co-catalyst, as depicted in Fig. 1c^26,69,70. The DFT results indicate that the rate-determining step is generally CO₂ activation during conversion to methanol over the hybrid catalysts, whose ΔG⁰ at 320 °C reaches 47 kJ/mol, which is much higher than that of the subsequent dehydration reaction (e.g., ΔG⁰ = −87 kJ/mol for methanol to xylene at 320 °C)^71,72; thus, an efficient CH₃OH synthesis catalyst is beneficial for the subsequent formation of C₂₊ compounds.

As indicated above, the bifunctional catalysts consist of CH₃OH synthesis and dehydration catalysts. However, is the bifunctional catalyst mechanism also the simple sum of the two individual reactions? Li et al.¹⁶ estimated the CH₃OH selectivity based on the hydrocarbon selectivity for a hybrid catalyst and found that it was much higher than that for ZnZrO alone. This result clearly indicates that the products from the bifunctional catalysts are not a simple sum of the two individual reactions, and these two catalysts have a large synergistic effect. Thus, further study on the direct CO₂ hydrogenation to C₂₊ products over bifunctional catalysts is still desirable.

Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS)-based CO₂ hydrogenation

Heterogeneous FTS-based CO₂ hydrogenation can be realized in either one or two reactors, although the single reactor process dominates. The direct one-reactor conversion system has drawn much attention due to its ease of operation and thus lower CO₂ conversion cost. This process integrates the reduction of CO₂ to CO via the RWGS reaction and hydrogenation of CO to hydrocarbons via FTS. An efficient catalyst for generating C₂₊ products, which generally refer to light olefins, liquid fuels, and higher alcohols, should be active for both RWGS and FTS under the same conditions (Fig. 2a, R5–R7). The product distribution can be wide, depending on the structure and composition of the catalysts. Iron (Fe), cobalt (Co), and ruthenium (Ru) based supported catalysts, with appropriate promoters, are predominantly used in this area.

$${\mathrm{nCO}}_2 + \left( {3{\mathrm{n}} + 1} \right){\mathrm{H}}_2 \to {\mathrm{C}}_{\mathrm{n}}{\mathrm{H}}_{{\mathrm{2n + 2}}} + {\mathrm{2nH}}_{\mathrm{2}}{\mathrm{O}}\quad \left( {{\mathrm{CO}}_2\,{\mathrm{Hydrogenation}}} \right)$$

(R5)

$$\Delta _{\mathrm{R}}{\mathrm{H}}_{{\mathrm{573K}}} = - 128\,{\mathrm{kJ/mol}}$$

$${\mathrm{CO}}_{\mathrm{2}} + {\mathrm{H}}_2 \to {\mathrm{CO}} + {\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}}\quad \left( {{\mathrm{RWGS}}} \right)$$

(R6)

$$\Delta _{\mathrm{R}}{\mathrm{H}}_{{\mathrm{573K}}} = 38\;{\mathrm{kJ/mol;}}$$

$${\mathrm{nCO}} + \left( {2{\mathrm{n}} + 1} \right){\mathrm{H}}_2 \to {\mathrm{C}}_n{\mathrm{H}}_{{\mathrm{2n + 2}}} + {\mathrm{nH}}_{\mathrm{2}}{\mathrm{O}}\quad \left( {{\mathrm{FTS}}} \right)$$

(R7)

$$\Delta _{\mathrm{R}}{\mathrm{H}}_{{\mathrm{573K}}} = - 166\,{\mathrm{kJ/mol}}$$

**Fig. 2: CO₂ hydrogenation to C₂₊ products via the FTS-based mechanism.**

(The values of Δ_RH are reproduced from the literature^73,74).

Prior to FTS, the RWGS reaction converts CO₂ to CO to form dissociatively adsorbed *CO precursor molecules on the catalyst surface. Therefore, an understanding of the reaction conditions and catalytic performance for the RWGS reaction is necessary. Since RWGS (R6) is endothermic, it requires high temperatures for reasonable conversions. CO selectivity up to 100% can be achieved at 200–600 °C using the primary RWGS catalysts, such as Cu- and noble metal (Pt, Pd, Rh)-based catalysts, with CO₂ conversions up to 50%⁷⁵.

Light olefins

Light olefins, including C₂–C₄ alkenes, are important target products for the FTS-based CO₂ hydrogenation process. Fe-based catalyst systems are considered to be most suitable for olefin production by applying appropriate promoters, textural additives, or supports to form the required active sites for the different reaction stages. Fe and Co-based catalysts with alkali metal promoters (e.g., 35Fe–7Zr–1Ce–K⁷⁶, Fe–Co/K–Al₂O₃ ⁷⁷, and C–Fe–Zn/K⁷⁸) are reported to be highly active for FTS to produce C₂₊ products^79,80 with as high as 57% selectivity at 40–60% CO₂ conversion (Fig. 2b). The most effective promoters are alkali metals, especially Na and K, as they limit the formation of methane while improving the selectivity to C₂₊ products⁸¹. Meiri et al.⁸² pointed out that the introduction of potassium can stabilize the texture of the Fe–Al–O spinel, increase the surface content of Fe₅C₂, and strengthen CO₂ adsorption. In one study of fourteen different kinds of promoters added individually to MOF-derived Fe/C catalysts (Fig. 2e), only K dramatically enhanced the olefin selectivity from 0.7 to 36%⁸³. Martinelli et al.⁸⁴ concluded that the K-loading did not influence the CO₂ conversion, but increased the olefin/paraffin ratio and the average molecular weight of the products. Besides the alkali metals, other metals such as Cu, Zn, Ni, Zr, Mn, and Pt can also be used to modify Fe-based catalysts⁸³. For example, bimetallic Fe–Cu/Al₂O₃ catalysts can suppress CH₄ formation and thus exhibit higher amounts of C₂–C₇ production compared with pure Fe/Al₂O₃ catalysts⁸⁵.

Support material is another important factor that can influence catalyst activity and product selectivity by affecting the dispersion of active metals and the interactions between reactive intermediates and the support material. The support materials for Fe-based FT catalysts can be divided into metal oxides (e.g., ZrO₂, CeO₂, and Al₂O₃) and carbonaceous materials (e.g., MOFs, mesoporous carbon, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), graphene, and organic precursors to mesoporous carbon). Wang et al.⁸⁶ studied several supports and found that a ZrO₂ supported (K-Fe/ZrO₂) catalyst exhibited the highest selectivity to lower olefins, while SiO₂ was not suitable for the CO₂-FTS reaction. Since Fe carbides are generally considered to be the active phase in FTS catalysis, carbon materials are naturally considered as good support materials for Fe catalysts; indeed, they have demonstrated excellent catalytic performance for olefin synthesis. Carbon support materials can improve the dispersion of the active metals and lead to higher selectivity to olefins⁸⁷. An Fe-based core–shell nanocatalyst with Fe₃O₄ and Fe₅C₂ in the core and partially graphitized carbon in the shell was prepared to efficiently convert CO₂ to C₂–C₄ ⁼ olefins. The olefin/paraffin ratio was increased by carefully controlling the content of carbon to improve the accessibility of reactants to the active sites⁸⁸. CNTs and graphene are also good carbon supports with superior thermal and chemical stability^87,89. For example, a honeycomb-structured graphene (HSG) with a special meso-macroporous architecture was devised to confine K-promoted Fe NPs for the CO₂-to olefins reaction. The FeK1.5/HSG catalyst can increase the selectivity of C₂–C₄ ⁼ to 59.0% and the stability to 120 h, due to K promotion and HSG confinement effects⁸⁹. Similarly, Ding et al. have successfully improved the catalytic activities by combining the K promoter and ZrO₂ support with sufficient oxygen defects⁹⁰.

C₅₊ products

Liquid fuels (e.g., gasoline and diesel) and other value-added chemicals (e.g., aromatics and isoparaffins) are also desired products from CO₂ hydrogenation via FTS. Jiang et al.⁹¹ prepared Fe- and FeCo-based catalysts and achieved, when promoted with an appropriate amount of K, ≥54.6% CO₂ conversions and ≥47.0% C₅₊ selectivity (Fig. 2c). A Na–Fe₃O₄/HZSM-5 catalyst with three types of active sites was developed by Wei et al., demonstrating that 22% of CO₂ can be directly converted to gasoline with a selectivity of 78%¹⁷. When HZSM-5 was changed to HMCM-22, aromatization was suppressed, while isomerization was promoted due to the appropriate Brønsted acid properties of HMCM-22 and the special lamellar structure consisting of two independent pore systems. Thus, 57% selectivity of isoparaffins was obtained over the Na–Fe₃O₄/HMCM-22 catalyst, while the values over Na–Fe₃O₄/HZSM-5 and Na–Fe₃O₄ were only 34 and 6%, respectively⁹². Similarly, aromatics are important feedstocks with applications in the synthesis of various polymers, petrochemicals, and medicines. ZnFeO_x–nNa/HZSM-5 catalysts can achieve 75.6% selectivity to total aromatics at a CO₂ conversion of 41.2% (Fig. 2f)⁹³.

Owing to superior ability for chain growth, stability, and lower activity for the WGS reaction, Co-based catalysts have also been applied to produce long-chain C₅₊ hydrocarbons. Recently, a pure Co-based catalyst without promoters was reported to display high performance for both CO-FTS and CO₂-FTS^94,95. The Co/MIL-53(Al) catalyst was first found to exhibit 47.1% CO conversion and 68.6% selectivity to C₅₊ products. When it was applied to CO₂-FTS, 35.0% selectivity to C₅₊ was still achieved at 260 °C. Furthermore, different kinds of promoters and support materials are employed to tune the product distribution towards heavier hydrocarbons. Shi et al. prepared a promoted Co–Cu bimetallic catalyst for CO₂ hydrogenation based on consideration of Cu as a popular RWGS catalyst. For example, with the introduction of Na as a promoter to a CoCu/TiO₂ catalyst, the CH₄ selectivity significantly decreased from 89.5 to 26.1%, while the C₅₊ selectivity increased from 4.9 to 42.1%, with an excellent stability of more than 200 h⁹⁶. He et al.⁹⁷ reported the bimetallic Co₆/MnO_x nanocatalyst with synergism between Co and Mn for 15.3% CO₂ conversion and 53.2% C₅₊ selectivity.

Higher alcohols

Reports of higher alcohol (C₂₊OH) production are less prevalent compared to methanol and other C₂₊ products of CO₂ hydrogenation. However, C₂₊OH alcohols have higher energy density and wider applications as fuel additives. The formation of higher alcohols is a parallel reaction competing with formation of hydrocarbons during the FTS process, resulting in much lower selectivity to C₂₊OH. Furthermore, the synthesis of C₂₊OH is difficult, as both C–C coupling and OH formation are required. Interestingly, water was found to enhance the selectivity of higher alcohols to 82.5% over a 1 wt% Pt/Co₃O₄ catalyst (Table 1, Entry 34)⁹⁸. Moreover, the C₂₊OH selectivity was affected by the volume fraction of water, increasing dramatically with small amounts (<20 vol%) of added water, and then decreased slightly with further addition of water (Fig. 2d). The promoting effect of water was attributed to assisting methanol dissociation to form more *CH₃ species. *CH₃ then can react with *CO to form *CH₃CO, which will be further hydrogenated to ethanol (EtOH). Also, ordered Pd–Cu NPs, with charge transfer between Pd and Cu, are reported to efficiently convert CO₂ to ethanol with 92.0% selectivity (Table 1, Entry 35). The rate-determining step of *CO hydrogenation to *HCO can be promoted on a Pd–Cu NPs/P25 catalyst, leading to lower *CO coverage and weaker *CO adsorption. Similarly, Cu–Fe and Zn–Fe interactions in the Fe-doped K/Cu–Zn catalyst have synergistic interactions, which can facilitate catalyst reduction and metal dispersion, as well as increase the yield of higher alcohols⁹⁹. The reduction temperature can be regulated to obtain different phase compositions over the Co-based catalysts. For example, an alumina-supported catalyst reduced at 600 °C (CoAlO_x−600) contained coexisting Co–CoO phases and exhibited 92.1% selectivity to ethanol at 140 °C, due to the formation of acetate intermediates from formate by insertion of *CH_x ¹⁰⁰.

Reaction mechanisms

Although many successful catalysts have been developed for the CO₂-FTS reaction, the nature of the active sites and reaction mechanism remain controversial. In view of the catalysts reported to date, the mechanism of the RWGS reaction can be assigned to either the decomposition of *HOCO intermediates or to direct C–O bond cleavage to produce *CO⁷⁵. Ko et al.¹⁰¹ pointed out that CO₂ can be activated to anionic CO₂ ^δ− through charge transfer from the pure and bimetallic alloy surfaces with bending of the structure and splitting of the π orbital. Both the adsorption energy of CO₂ ^δ− and the reaction energy for CO₂ dissociation are a linear function of adsorption energies of *CO and *O. To facilitate further *CO hydrogenation, the interaction between *CO and the catalyst interface need to be enhanced; otherwise, *CO is desorbed with concomitantly increased CO selectivity. According to the most-accepted reaction mechanism, during the FTS process, steps including *CO dissociative chemisorption on the active sites with hydrogen-assisted insertion to form *CH_x intermediates, initiation of chain growth through the coupling of *CH_x, and the termination of chain growth through further hydrogenation, dehydrogenation, or insertion of non-dissociatively adsorbed *CO happen successively on the catalyst surface (Fig. 2a). *CO intermediates can be produced through the RWGS reaction, followed by the FTS reaction. According to modeling and kinetic analysis by Willauer et al., the RWGS reaction rate can reach 3.5 × 10⁵ s⁻¹ initially and decreases to 0.032 s⁻¹ within 2 s, while the FTS reaction rate is zero initially and increases to 0.004 s⁻¹ at 18.7 s¹⁰². The FTS reaction is the rate-limiting step due to the much lower reaction rate. The FTS reaction during the CO₂ hydrogenation process is limited by the reaction between the adsorbed CO and H₂ to form *HCO intermediates, as reported by Pour et al.¹⁰³ after evaluating different kinetic models and applying a genetic algorithm (GA) approach and the Levenberg–Marquardt (LM) method. Thus, efficient active sites for the FTS reaction are important for the whole CO₂ hydrogenation process. Also, chain propagation in FTS is still in dispute based on the basic C–C coupling mechanisms¹⁰⁴. The most limiting process or factor during FTS-based CO₂ hydrogenation that should be addressed in future research may be affected significantly because of the various thermodynamic and physical properties of the reactions. For example, when using higher reaction temperatures (>300 °C), mass transfer appears to become the rate-limiting step instead of the surface reaction at relatively low temperatures¹⁰⁵.

Concerning the active sites in iron and cobalt catalysts, several phases are present and change dynamically during reaction. The catalyst transformation in structure and composition has several steps with their own kinetic regimes¹⁰⁶. The reduced iron catalysts mainly consist of α-Fe and Fe₃O₄ with extremely low activity at the beginning of FTS. Fe₃O₄ is capable of activating CO₂ to CO via the RWGS reaction^81,107. Then, the α-Fe reacts with the dissociatively adsorbed CO to form iron carbide (e.g., Fe₅C₂), generating Fischer–Tropsch activity. Thus, the catalytic sites of iron carbides appear to be active for CO activation and chain growth⁸¹. Considering the different functions of iron species and the zeolites' superior properties of acid sites for oligomerization/aromatization/isomerization, a multifunctional structure Na–Fe₃O₄/HZSM-5 catalyst was developed and achieved as high as 78% selectivity to gasoline, with only 4% methane generated¹⁷. Therefore, researchers need to focus not only on optimizing the composition and structure of the catalysts, but also on developing new catalytic systems with desired properties by using comprehensive approaches that can directly control the microstructures of the catalysts and be used for more accurately identifying the reaction pathways during FTS-based CO₂ hydrogenation.

It is generally accepted that bulk Fe catalysts show insufficient catalytic performance and that the addition of promoters can enhance the selectivity to C₂₊ products. However, the essential basis of the promotion effect remains unclear. More investigation needs to focus on the reaction mechanism. For example, the reaction pathways over Fe/Al₂O₃, Cu/Al₂O₃, and Fe–Cu/Al₂O₃ catalysts are different, resulting in different product distributions⁸⁵. Cu has high activity for the RWGS reaction instead of the CO₂ methanation reaction, leading to more surface *CO. Thus, bimetallic Fe–Cu/Al₂O₃ catalysts form more CO, which leads to more C₂₊ hydrocarbons compared to the Fe/Al₂O₃ catalyst. Nie et al. also investigated the mechanism of CO₂ hydrogenation to methane and C₂ hydrocarbons over Fe(100) and Cu–Fe(100) surfaces and showed that the hydrogenation barrier of CH₂* species is higher than those for C–C coupling and CH–CH* conversion to ethylene on Cu–Fe bimetallic catalysts (see Fig. 3)¹⁰⁸, which results in a more selective process to ethylene. The addition of K to Fe–Cu/Al₂O₃ catalysts can further inhibit methanation and enhance the production of olefin-rich C₂–C₄ hydrocarbons by increasing the surface coverage of carbon⁸⁵. DFT calculations show that the presence of K on Fe-based surfaces can enhance the CO₂ adsorption strength and reduce the CO₂ dissociation barrier (e.g., 2.36 eV for oct2-Fe₃O₄(111) versus 1.13 eV for K/oct2-Fe₃O₄(111))¹⁰⁹. Therefore, the introduction of promoters can modify the surface electronic features.

**Fig. 3: Mechanistic insight into C–C coupling over Fe-Cu bimetallic catalysts.**

Outlook

Methanol reaction based CO₂ hydrogenation

The primary challenge in converting CO₂ to value-added products is low selectivity due to excessive formation of CO and the large amount of water (H₂O) generated. CO and CH₄ are both formed due to partial reduction and cracking, respectively, during dehydration at the elevated temperatures (≥400 °C) generally employed for dehydration. To date, it has limited conversion (<30%) towards desired products (Table 1, Entries 1–5, 7–13). In addition, H₂O produced from CH₃OH synthesis and dehydrative coupling further complicates separations and, in some cases, deactivates the catalyst. However, altering the zeolite structure has been shown to alter product distributions and increase selectivity to desired products, which was realized by increasing the space velocity during catalytic CO₂ hydrogenation over In₂O₃ combined with zeolites^26,110. Through the introduction of CO conversion promoters, such as In–FeK, In–CoNa, or CuZnFe/zeolites, bifunctional catalysts can be upgraded to reduce CO formation. In addition, these catalytic CO₂ conversion technologies face several other challenges, such as revealing the relationship between product type and molecular sieve type, increasing the CO₂ conversion and final product yield via improving the structures of bifunctional catalysts, as well as further elucidating the reaction mechanisms. More detailed information on these points is depicted below.

First, more research on the zeolite properties is needed. By varying the zeolite structure, the product distribution can be better controlled. For example, HZSM-5 zeolite is selective towards DME and gasoline, whereas SAPO molecular sieves are preferred for light olefin generation. However, the structure-property relations between zeolite properties and CO₂ hydrogenation activity have not yet been systematically investigated. Because many variables and conditions exist during zeolites synthesis (e.g., synthesis template, crystallization temperature, and Si/Al ratio), the relationship between zeolite properties and CO₂ hydrogenation activity remains an active area of study^111,112,113. Shape-selective catalysis was identified as a factor in these catalysts, as SAPO zeolite windows allowed only small linear hydrocarbons to pass, while H-ZSM zeolite windows allowed much larger branched and linear hydrocarbons to leave¹¹⁴. In addition, DFT calculations have linked density of surface Lewis acids and defects in the zeolite structure with dehydration activity^115,116.

Second, additional research on the structure of bifunctional catalysts is required. To improve CO₂ conversion and final product yield, the morphology and structure of the bifunctional catalysts should be optimized, rather than just making physical mixtures. The precise control of the desired morphology and structure of the catalyst is a significant and synthetically challenging task (see Fig. 4a–c), as shown by the example of utilizing core–shell structures incorporating multiple-metal oxide cores to direct the growth of zeolite shells. Additionally, catalysts with core–sheath and lamellar structures are reported to exhibit high activity and stability for C=O bond hydrogenation¹¹⁷. Bifunctional catalysts can be assembled via layer-by-layer growth methods and probably exhibit better performance. Furthermore, efforts to improve important intrinsic factors, like the dispersion and crystallite size of active metals on methanol synthesis catalysts and the acid strength together with acid sites on the zeolites, as well as the methods of integration of the active components, should be made. As shown in Fig. 4d–f, different product distributions were obtained when the methanol synthesis catalyst and the zeolite were synthesized with different spatial arrangements^16,26,71. The TEM and SEM images in Fig. 4g–i indicate that ZnZrO particles can be highly dispersed on the surface of HZSM-5 and maintain their own structures^16,26,71. Sufficient physical mixing of the two components seems to be better than the granular form or a dual-bed separated in space by a layer of quartz sand.

**Fig. 4: The structure and performance of bifunctional catalysts.**

Analyzing the integration between methanol synthesis catalysts and zeolites remains a challenge. DFT calculations may be the most efficient method to explore the interactions between CH₃OH synthesis catalysts and dehydration catalysts. However, the information gained from DFT calculations can be limited because the systems studied are under idealized conditions, which are different from the ones in a packed bed reactor. As computing power with machine learning continues to increase, more complex and realistic catalytic systems can be modeled, which provides deep insight into the mechanism of CO₂ hydrogenation to olefins, such as the design of 3D nanocrystal tandem catalysts with multiple interfaces for CO₂ hydrogenation.

FTS-based CO₂ hydrogenation

The major obstacles of FTS-based CO₂ hydrogenation lie in the thermal stability of CO₂ and the complicated reaction mechanism with a wide product distribution. With the RWGS process being endothermic and FTS being exothermic, both need to be efficiently catalyzed under the same conditions, which sets a very strict requirement for the catalytic system. The designed catalysts should be effective for the RWGS reaction and also active enough for the subsequent FTS reaction. Different active sites must be precisely tuned and carefully dispersed on the support materials. These challenges will be discussed in view of different kinds of products: olefins, C₅₊ hydrocarbons, and higher alcohols.

The first, challenge to be discussed is production of light olefins. In spite of the promising results discussed, major challenges still remain. For example, the selectivity of C₂–C₄ ⁼ can be above 80% for catalysts with methanol as the reactive intermediate, while only about 50% selectivity to C₂–C₄ ⁼ is achieved on the catalysts for CO₂ conversion via FTS (Table 1, Entries 14–21). The key to improve the C₂₊ selectivity is to develop catalysts that have compatible bifunctional active sites for the two reaction steps, namely, *CO generation and subsequent *CO hydrogenation. The appropriately engineered reaction window is extremely important. The consequence of the incompatible activity of these two different types of active sites could be high CH₄ selectivity (~30%, Table 1, Entries 14–21), as is suggested by the activation energy of RWGS being higher than that of CH₄ formation (81.0 and 59.3 kJ/mol, respectively) for Fe-based catalytic CO₂ hydrogenation¹⁰⁵. As shown in Table 1 (Entries 1–8, 14–23), the reaction temperature (~320 °C) for the CO₂-FTS process is lower than that for the methanol-mediated route (~380 °C). Thus, the CO selectivity (~30%) is dramatically reduced due to relatively low temperatures for the RWGS reaction, leading to improved hydrocarbon selectivity.

Many researchers have tried to provide possible solutions for improving C₂₊ selectivity by adjusting the structures and compositions of the catalysts. Specifically, development of enhanced promoters, supports, and experimental conditions have been attempted. For example, bulk Fe is favorable for methane formation; however, olefin and long-chain hydrocarbon production can be enhanced with the addition of promoters (i.e., alkaline promoters). Potassium, as an electronic promoter, can regulate the phase proportion of Fe⁰/FeO_x/FeC_x to maintain an optimum balance. The dissociative adsorption of *CO can be improved, while surface *H is decreased by donated electrons to the vacant d-orbital of Fe. The resulting higher C/H ratio favors chain growth and chain termination by forming unsaturated hydrocarbons¹¹⁸. Thus, a very important challenge is to increase the surface C/H ratio. Competitive adsorption between H₂ and CO occurs on the catalyst surface. The partial pressure of CO is always limited due the difficulty of converting CO₂ via the RWGS reaction. Since a high C/H ratio is desired to form unsaturated hydrocarbons, a possible strategy would be to enhance CO₂ activation and CO adsorption, while weakening H₂ adsorption¹⁰¹. In addition, the H₂ ratio in the feed gas should also be carefully chosen. To achieve good results from FTS-based CO₂ hydrogenation, more consideration is needed based on the characteristics of those reactions instead of imitation of the CO hydrogenation process.

To increase selectivity to light olefins, further hydrogenation must be suppressed. Thus, synergy between the promoter and the support is suggested. For example, an Al₂O₃ support can interact with a K promoter to form a KAlO₂ phase under calcination temperatures above 500 °C, which has been shown to suppress further hydrogenation of olefins⁷⁷. To increase the synergistic effect, the active metal can be mixed with supports. A series of K-modified supports (activated carbon, TiO₂, ZrO₂, SBA-15, B-ZSM-5, and Al₂O₃) were physically mixed with Fe₅C₂ and tested for direct hydrogenation of CO₂. The Fe₅C₂–10 K/α-Al₂O₃ catalyst converted 40.9% of CO₂ with a selectivity of 73.5% to C₂₊ products, containing 37.3% C₂–C₄ ⁼ and 31.1% C₅₊ ¹¹⁹. A promising support for Fe-based catalysts is MOF-derived carbon materials. Some researchers have recently developed methods of using MOFs to fabricate carbon supported Fe-based catalysts^83,120. Two Fe-MOF-derived catalysts have been reported for CO₂ hydrogenation, with high stability and selectivity to light olefins and liquid fuels^120,121. However, the challenge of separating light olefins from unreacted CO₂ and H₂ remains. Increasingly advanced techniques and materials are required for their separation.

The second, set of challenges are production of C₅₊ products. These challenges are similar to those for the synthesis of light olefins, due to the shared fundamental reaction mechanism. The selectivity of C₅₊ products is also comparable to that of light olefins synthesis (Table 1, Entries 22–31). CO₂ hydrogenation to C₅₊ products consist of multiple steps, including the RWGS reaction, C–C coupling, and acid-catalyzed reactions (oligomerization, isomerization, or aromatization). Therefore, cooperation between steps is required to develop an efficient and multifunctional catalyst. As zeolites are often used to incorporate the active sites, they generally undergo deactivation as a result of coke deposition. For example, the selectivity of isoparaffins over a Na–Fe₃O₄/HMCM-22 catalyst was reduced from ~60 to ~30% and the total acidity of HMCM-22 decreased from 0.200 to 0.032 mmol_pyridine g_cat ⁻¹ after 12 h of reaction time, which was attributed to coke formation and accumulation in the cavities and channels⁹². Thus, a big challenge for the synthesis of C₅₊ products is to reduce coke deposition in the zeolites and to enhance the catalyst stability. As heavier hydrocarbons contain many components, it is difficult to precisely control a specific type of product. Zeolites with different framework topologies are suggested to regulate product distribution. In addition, in contrast to the CO-based FTS process, the reaction is fed with stable CO₂ molecules; therefore, the reformation of CO₂ from the produced CO via the WGS reaction is a thermodynamically favorable process, which limits CO₂ conversion^17,122. One method to decrease the reformation of CO₂ from CO is to develop better multifunctional catalysts by employing appropriate promoters to facilitate the formation of iron carbide, which is known as the active catalyst for heavy hydrocarbon formation in FTS⁹⁶, and to enhance the chemisorption and dissociation of CO₂ ¹²³. Also, by cycling reactants, CO₂ conversion is increased. Therefore, finding suitable multifunctional catalyst combinations or promoters and optimizing the reactors should be an attractive area of research in the future. Dual-promoter systems are usually designed to improve the RWGS reaction activity, while increasing FTS activity and C₅₊ selectivity. Finally, there is a significant gap between the quality of synthesized liquid fuels and commercial gasoline. The octane number would be enhanced by developing catalysts that increase the fraction of isoparaffins in the gasoline.

Finally, the challenges to produce higher alcohols are considered. For higher alcohols synthesis, the major obstacles are the formation and insertion of the hydroxyl group during the C–C coupling process in the presence of parallel reactions. This is made even more challenging since the formation pathways are different over Fe- and Co-based catalysts and the mechanisms are controversial. On K/Fe/N-functionalized CNT catalysts, alcohol synthesis was explained by the reaction between hydrocarbon species, such as alkylidenes (R-CH₂-CH = ), and *OH, which forms from the dissociation of adsorbed CO (*CO) and H₂ (*H)⁷³. *CO was hypothesized to react with *CH₃ species to form *CH₃CO, which was then hydrogenated to form CH₃CH₂OH on a Na-Co/SiO₂ catalyst. To increase the yield of higher alcohols, efficient Co-based catalysts with more stable cobalt carbide (Co-Co₂C) interfaces and/or Co-M alloy nanocrystals should be developed. Co₂C is responsible for CO adsorption on the surface, whereas the Co metal is useful for CO dissociation and subsequent carbon-chain growth¹²⁴. The synthesis of higher alcohols requires precise coordination between C–C coupling and OH formation, otherwise, more methanol or long-chain hydrocarbons would be produced. Also, the synergy of high metal dispersion and a high-density of hydroxyl groups on the supports can promote the selectivity to ethanol because the hydroxyls are able to stabilize formate species and protonate methanol¹⁸. The work from Fan's group also indicates that metal oxyhydroxides, such as FeOOH¹²⁵, TiO(OH)₂ ¹, and ZrO(OH)₂ ¹²⁶ can accelerate the CO₂ sorption and desorption processes, thus reducing the energy required for CO₂ capture based on experimental and DFT calculations. These metal oxyhydroxides are likely catalyst candidates because they contain hydroxyl groups that should enhance CO₂ hydrogenation to higher alcohols.

Transformational technologies for catalyst development

Revolutionary material manufacturing, characterization, and evaluation technologies emerging in the new century may be instrumental for hydrogenating CO₂ to high-value products. However, these technologies are only beginning to be explored for their application to CO₂ hydrogenation. Thus, this perspective endeavors to fill in critical blanks. The keys are to discover alternative catalysts, modify current catalysts for CO₂ activation, develop methods to prepare specialized catalysts on a large-scale, and intelligently evaluate catalysts. Guided by reaction theories and the associated heterogeneous catalytic CO₂ hydrogenation experimental results, the feasibility of transformational technologies in three phases of CO₂ hydrogenation will be explored: catalyst preparation and modification, characterization, and AI-guided evaluation (see Fig. 5).

**Fig. 5: Scheme of AI-guided development of CO₂ hydrogenation catalysts.**

Phase I is CO₂ hydrogenation catalyst preparation and modification. Conventional labor-intensive lab-based CO₂ hydrogenation catalyst preparation may be replaced by low-cost 3D-printing approaches to include characteristics of high mechanical strength and surface-to-volume ratio, with precise control of porosity, size, and shape¹²⁷. The development of 3D-printed catalysts with designable and tunable structures is appealing and potentially useful for catalyst synthesis on a large scale. Although green 3D-printing has been utilized in preparing highly active, reusable, and stable catalysts for CO₂ removal, methane combustion, methanol to olefins conversion, syngas methanation, and N-aryl compound synthesis^{128,129,130,131}, it has not been used for CO₂ hydrogenation or CO₂ conversion catalysts to date. Also, most of the printed catalysts are millimeter- to micrometer-sized materials, while nano- or atomic-sized catalysts are still challenging to print by existing 3D printing technology. As the functional components of active CO₂ hydrogenation catalysts are further studied (e.g., metals, promoters, and supports), more effort can be devoted to incorporating them into a fully integrated platform with diverse microstructures by 3D printing. As different spatial arrangements in bifunctional catalysts influence catalytic performance, 3D printing can assemble the components with multiple structures in their preferred configuration. Therefore, 3D printing provides an alternative approach for preparation of novel CO₂ hydrogenation catalysts, especially for synthesizing bifunctional catalysts. Realizing that AI has proven to be a great tool in a range of fields, including materials discovery and design¹³², the authors intend to apply a pioneering outlook with its application to CO₂ hydrogenation catalyst preparation, especially in combination with 3D printing technology. The 3D printing strategy already has advantages in potential scale-up manufacturing of catalysts, and AI technology would accelerate its application. AI-assisted 3D printing technologies can open new possibilities for the large-scale conversion of CO₂.

Also, new material modification technologies, such as microwave, ultrasound, and plasma treatments, have been suggested to modify catalysts for CO₂ activation, especially if the particle sizes or metal dispersion are affected by the 3D printing technologies. The utilization of unconventional modification tools in catalyst preparation and treatment can improve active phase dispersion to obtain a more uniform morphology with smaller particle sizes compared to the untreated catalysts^133,134,135. Smaller particle size would enhance specific surface area and the exposed active sites available. The catalyst mechanical strength and the average basic site strength for CO₂ adsorption can be increased by microwave irradiation treatment, due to its better heat transfer¹³³. Catalysts synthesized with the assistance of ultrasound, microwave, or plasma treatments have been employed in CO₂ hydrogenation and CO₂/CH₄ reforming reactions^134,136. These unconventional methods need high frequency and input power with reduced processing time^135,137,138. In addition, the reactor can be constructed with plasma or microwave enhancement. The CO₂-to-CH₃OH reaction was accomplished in a plasma reactor without heating or adding pressure, generating a CH₃OH selectivity of 53.7% and a CO₂ conversion of 21.2% over a Cu/γ-Al₂O₃ catalyst¹³⁶. Coupling of plasma and catalyst lowered the kinetic barrier and energy cost associated with conventional high temperature and high pressure processing. Therefore, the use of these new modification technologies before or after 3D printing can possibly remedy defects introduced by 3D printing technologies.

Phase II is to characterize the CO₂ hydrogenation catalysts. New material characterization technologies, including in situ scanning transmission electron microscopy and temporal analysis of product reactors, coupled with qualitative and/or quantitative species identification, such as gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, are suggested for characterization of the catalysts prepared with state-of-the-art and transformational technologies. To date, in situ CO₂-temperature programmed surface reaction and diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy have been applied widely to elucidate how CO₂ molecules dynamically interact with the catalyst. However, other characterization methods for heterogeneous catalysts under in situ conditions are challenging due to the lack of experimental facilities. Therefore, in the future, AI-assisted CO₂ hydrogenation catalyst characterizations are needed. Machine learning especially can bring advanced computational techniques to the forefront of characterization of heterogeneous catalysts. For example, machine learning can be used to help interpret experimental spectra. Although the imaging and spectroscopic results are complicated, it would be helpful to design new catalysts and link models and experiments by connecting these results to structure–function information¹³⁹. Timoshenko et al.¹⁴⁰ have successfully deciphered the 3D geometric structure of supported Pt NPs with the use of X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy and supervised machine learning. They solved the structures and reconstructed the morphology of Pt NPs just from the experimental XANES data using an artificial neural network. Therefore, theoretical simulations can assist in obtaining more spectra and deconvoluting the structural characterization.

Phase III is to perform AI-guided evaluation of CO₂ hydrogenation catalysts. The prospect of using AI for identification of reaction intermediates and pathways and establishing kinetic models would be promising. First, the AI-guided method is expected to predict catalytic performance and to discover promising catalyst candidates. AI-based catalyst evaluation might largely help predict and improve catalyst stability, which however will require more significant effort. Zahrt et al.¹⁴¹ pointed out that machine learning has the potential to change the way chemists select and optimize catalysts. Some examples of recent results in AI-based catalyst evaluation follow. The hydrocarbon selectivities for DME conversion can be accurately predicted by an AI model with an R ² greater than 0.98 compared to experimental results¹⁴². Several known and unknown electrocatalysts for CO₂ reduction and hydrogen evolution were identified from 1499 intermetallics by machine learning²⁷. Specifically, 258 candidate surfaces among 102 alloys have been identified from 23,141 adsorption sites for the H₂ evolution reaction.

Currently, it is inconvenient to characterize catalyst structures in situ during stability tests. Thus, in situ monitoring of the catalyst structure dynamics and transformation by AI would be beneficial. Second, we need more automatic, integrated, and flexible set-ups to evaluate catalysts. Third, data analysis could be performed and kinetic models evaluated with the help of AI. Numerous experimental data for CO₂ hydrogenation have been generated and this existing data should be reanalyzed. Kitchin suggests that machine learning can be applied to build models with more sophisticated methods¹⁴³, generating new relevant data and calculated properties. Furthermore, it is crucial to identify reaction intermediates and pathways by AI. A simple syngas reaction on Rh(111) exhibits more than 2000 potential pathways¹⁴⁴, in comparison with the more complicated CO₂ hydrogenation reaction routes that are strongly influenced by the various active centers. Hence, it is necessary to analyze the reaction mechanism by employing machine learning and DFT calculations.

Finally, predicting relationships among the characteristics of the catalysts, such as Lewis acidity, CO₂ conversion efficiency, and product selectivity, with AI based on the available experimental data and DFT computation results will be helpful for discussing structure–function relationships and accelerating the discovery of catalytic mechanisms. Although AI offers many promising applications in CO₂ hydrogenation, robust and versatile AI is still in a primitive stage. A difficulty for AI development comes from the slowly developing applications of big data and a convenient language or software. Li et al.²⁸ pointed out that it is crucial and challenging to build additional criteria for screening and synthesizing catalysts, to quantify the uncertainties of machine-learning models, and to develop fingerprints of more sophisticated active sites with targeted functionalities. Also, more data for machine learning are required, including all reactions related to CO₂, such as FTS, CO₂/CH₄ reforming, and CO₂ hydrogenation. In conclusion, the collaborative efforts from experts and scientists in catalysis and materials design, machine-learning practitioners, and algorithm developers all over the world are needed to promote its development.

References

1.
Lai, Q. et al. Catalyst-TiO(OH)₂ could drastically reduce the energy consumption of CO₂ capture. Nat. Commun. 9, 2672 (2018). This paper introduces a robust nanostructured TiO(OH) ₂ catalyst for CO ₂ capture at low temperature .

ADS PubMed PubMed Central Article CAS Google Scholar
2.
Cui, S. et al. Mesoporous amine-modified SiO₂ aerogel: a potential CO₂ sorbent. Energ. Environ. Sci. 4, 2070–2074 (2011).

CAS Article Google Scholar
3.
Richard, A. R. & Fan, M. Low-pressure hydrogenation of CO₂ to CH₃OH using Ni-In-Al/SiO₂ catalyst synthesized via a phyllosilicate precursor. ACS Catal. 7, 5679–5692 (2017).

CAS Article Google Scholar
4.
Rogelj, J. et al. Paris agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C. Nature 534, 631–639 (2016).

ADS CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
5.
Davis, S. J., Caldeira, K. & Matthews, H. D. Future CO₂ emissions and climate change from existing energy infrastructure. Science 329, 1330–1333 (2010).

ADS CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
6.
Jin, F. et al. High-yield reduction of carbon dioxide into formic acid by zero-valent metal/metal oxideredox cycles. Energ. Environ. Sci. 4, 881–884 (2011).

CAS Article Google Scholar
7.
Sun, Y. et al. In situ hydrogenation of CO₂ by Al/Fe and Zn/Cu alloy catalysts under mild conditions. Chem. Eng. Technol. 42, 1223–1231 (2019).

CAS Article Google Scholar
8.
Lyu, L., Zeng, X., Yun, J., Wei, F. & Jin, F. No catalyst addition and highly efficient dissociation of H₂O for the reduction of CO₂ to formic acid with Mn. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 6003–6009 (2014).

ADS CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
9.
Zhong, H. et al. Selective conversion of carbon dioxide into methane with a 98% yield on an in situ formed Ni nanoparticle catalyst in water. Chem. Eng. J. 357, 421–427 (2019).

ADS CAS Article Google Scholar
10.
Yang, Y. et al. Synergetic conversion of microalgae and CO₂ into value-added chemicals under hydrothermal conditions. Green Chem. 21, 1247–1252 (2019).

CAS Article Google Scholar
11.
Wang, Y. et al. Exploring the ternary interactions in Cu-ZnO-ZrO₂ catalysts for efficient CO₂ hydrogenation to methanol. Nat. Commun. 10, 1166 (2019).

ADS PubMed PubMed Central Article CAS Google Scholar
12.
Yan, Y., Dai, Y. H., He, H., Yu, Y. B. & Yang, Y. H. A novel W-doped Ni-Mg mixed oxide catalyst for CO₂ methanation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 196, 108–116 (2016).

CAS Article Google Scholar
13.
Kothandaraman, J., Goeppert, A., Czaun, M., Olah, G. A. & Prakash, G. K. Conversion of CO₂ from air into methanol using a polyamine and a homogeneous ruthenium catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 778–781 (2016).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
14.
Roy, S., Cherevotan, A. & Peter, S. C. Thermochemical CO₂ hydrogenation to single carbon products: Scientific and technological challenges. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 1938–1966 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
15.
Saravanan, K., Ham, H., Tsubaki, N. & Bae, J. W. Recent progress for direct synthesis of dimethyl ether from syngas on the heterogeneous bifunctional hybrid catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 217, 494–522 (2017).

CAS Article Google Scholar
16.
Li, Z. et al. Highly selective conversion of carbon dioxide to lower olefins. ACS Catal. 7, 8544–8548 (2017).

CAS Article Google Scholar
17.
Wei, J. et al. Directly converting CO₂ into a gasoline fuel. Nat. Commun. 8, 15174–15181 (2017). This paper reports a multifunctional catalyst with three types of active sites for CO ₂ hydrogenation to gasoline fuel .

ADS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
18.
Yang, C. et al. Hydroxyl-mediated ethanol selectivity of CO₂ hydrogenation. Chem. Sci. 10, 3161–3167 (2019). This paper highlights the synergism of high metal dispersion and high-density hydroxyl groups in promoting the selectivity to ethanol .

CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
19.
Wu, J., Huang, Y., Ye, W. & Li, Y. CO₂ reduction: from the electrochemical to photochemical approach. Adv. Sci. 4, 1700194 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar
20.
Prieto, G. Carbon dioxide hydrogenation into higher hydrocarbons and oxygenates: thermodynamic and kinetic bounds and progress with heterogeneousand homogeneous catalysis. ChemSusChem 10, 1056–1070 (2017).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
21.
Wang, W., Wang, S., Ma, X. & Gong, J. Recent advances in catalytic hydrogenation of carbon dioxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 3703–3727 (2011).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
22.
Alvarez, A. et al. Challenges in the greener production of formates/formic acid, methanol, and DME by heterogeneously catalyzed CO₂ hydrogenation processes. Chem. Rev. 117, 9804–9838 (2017).

CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
23.
Olah, G. A., Mathew, T. & Prakash, G. K. Chemical formation of methanol and hydrocarbon ("Organic") derivatives from CO₂ and H₂-carbon sources for subsequent biological cell evolution and life's origin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 566–570 (2017).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
24.
Jia, J. et al. Heterogeneous catalytic hydrogenation of CO₂ by metal oxides: defect engineering-perfecting imperfection. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 4631–4644 (2017).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
25.
Kattel, S., Liu, P. & Chen, J. G. Turning selectivity of CO₂ hydrogenation reactions at the metal/oxide interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 9739–9754 (2017).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
26.
Gao, P. et al. Direct conversion of CO₂ into liquid fuels with high selectivity over a bifunctional catalyst. Nat. Chem. 9, 1019–1024 (2017). This paper reports discovery of an In ₂ O ₃ /HZSM-5 bifunctional catalyst for CO ₂ hydrogenation to C ₅₊ hydrocarbons through methanol intermediates .

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
27.
Tran, K. & Ulissi, Z. W. Active learning across intermetallics to guide discovery of electrocatalysts for CO₂ reduction and H₂ evolution. Nat. Catal. 1, 696–703 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
28.
Li, Z., Wang, S. & Xin, H. Toward artificial intelligence in catalysis. Nat. Catal. 1, 641–642 (2018). This paper points out the development and challenges of the implementation of artificial intelligence in catalysis .

Article Google Scholar
29.
Parra-Cabrera, C., Achille, C., Kuhn, S. & Ameloot, R. 3D printing in chemical engineering and catalytic technology: structured catalysts, mixers and reactors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 209–230 (2018).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
30.
Samson, K. et al. Influence of ZrO₂ structure and copper electronic state on activity of Cu/ZrO₂ catalysts in methanol synthesis from CO₂. ACS Catal. 4, 3730–3741 (2014).

CAS Article Google Scholar
31.
Rui, N. et al. CO2 hydrogenation to methanol over Pd/In₂O₃: effects of Pd and oxygen vacancy. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 218, 488–497 (2017).

CAS Article Google Scholar
32.
Kattel, S., Ramírez, P. J., Chen, J. G., Rodriguez, J. A. & Liu, P. Active sites for CO₂ hydrogenation to methanol on Cu/ZnO catalysts. Science 355, 1296–1299 (2017). This paper studies model catalysts and identifies a synergy of Cu and ZnO at the interface to form methanol through formate intermediates .

ADS CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
33.
Behrens, M. et al. The active site of methanol synthesis over Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ industrial catalysts. Science 336, 893–897 (2012).

ADS CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
34.
Bansode, A. & Urakawa, A. Towards full one-pass conversion of carbon dioxide to methanol and methanol-derived products. J. Catal. 309, 66–70 (2014).

CAS Article Google Scholar
35.
Rungtaweevoranit, B. et al. Copper nanocrystals encapsulated in Zr-based metal-organic frameworks for highly selective CO₂ hydrogenation to methanol. Nano Lett. 16, 7645–7649 (2016).

ADS CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
36.
An, B. et al. Confinement of ultrasmall Cu/ZnO_x nanoparticles in metal-organic frameworks for selective methanol synthesis from catalytic hydrogenation of CO₂. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 3834–3840 (2017).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
37.
Lam, E. et al. Isolated Zr surface sites on silica promote hydrogenation of CO₂ to CH₃OH in supported Cu catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 10530–10535 (2018).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
38.
Larmier, K. et al. CO₂-to-methanol hydrogenation on Zirconia-supported copper nanoparticles: Reaction intermediates and the role of the metal-support interface. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 2318–2323 (2017).

CAS Article Google Scholar
39.
Sun, K. H. et al. Hydrogenation of CO₂ to methanol over In₂O₃ catalyst. J. CO ₂ Util. 12, 1–6 (2015).
40.
Martin, O. et al. Indium oxide as a superior catalyst for methanol synthesis by CO₂ hydrogenation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 6261–6265 (2016).

CAS Article Google Scholar
41.
Li, H. et al. Synergetic interaction between neighbouring platinum monomers in CO₂ hydrogenation. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 411–417 (2018).

ADS CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
42.
Nie, X. et al. Mechanistic understanding of alloy effect and water promotion for Pd-Cu bimetallic catalysts in CO₂ hydrogenation to methanol. ACS Catal. 8, 4873–4892 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
43.
Yin, Y. et al. Pd@zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 derived PdZn alloy catalysts for efficient hydrogenation of CO₂ to methanol. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 234, 143–152 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
44.
Studt, F. et al. Discovery of a Ni-Ga catalyst for carbon dioxide reduction to methanol. Nat. Chem. 6, 320–324 (2014).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
45.
Fiordaliso, E. M. et al. Intermetallic GaPd₂ nanoparticles on SiO₂ for low-pressure CO₂ hydrogenation to methanol: catalytic performance and in situ characterization. ACS Catal. 5, 5827–5836 (2015).

CAS Article Google Scholar
46.
Yang, X. et al. Low pressure CO₂ hydrogenation to methanol over gold nanoparticles activated on a CeO_x/TiO₂ interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 10104–10107 (2015).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
47.
Toyao, T., Kayamori, S., Maeno, Z., Siddiki, S. M. A. H. & Shimizu, K.-i Heterogeneous Pt and MoOx Co-loaded TiO₂ catalysts for low-temperature CO₂ hydrogenation to form CH₃OH. ACS Catal. 9, 8187–8196 (2019).

CAS Article Google Scholar
48.
Richard, A. R. & Fan, M. The effect of lanthanide promoters on NiInAl/SiO₂ catalyst for methanol synthesis. Fuel 222, 513–522 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
49.
Ham, H., Baek, S. W., Shin, C.-H. & Bae, J. W. Roles of structural promoters for direct CO₂ hydrogenation to dimethyl ether over ordered mesoporous bifunctional Cu/M–Al₂O₃ (M = Ga or Zn). ACS Catal. 9, 679–690 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar
50.
Yang, G., Tsubaki, N., Shamoto, J., Yoneyama, Y. & Zhang, Y. Confinement effect and synergistic function of H-ZSM-5/Cu-ZnO-Al₂O₃ capsule catalyst for one-step controlled synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 8129–8136 (2010).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
51.
Phienluphon, R. et al. Designing core (Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃)–shell (SAPO-11) zeolite capsule catalyst with a facile physical way for dimethyl ether direct synthesis from syngas. Chem. Eng. J. 270, 605–611 (2015).

CAS Article Google Scholar
52.
Dang, S. et al. Role of zirconium in direct CO₂ hydrogenation to lower olefins on oxide/zeolite bifunctional catalysts. J. Catal. 364, 382–393 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
53.
Gao, J., Jia, C. & Liu, B. Direct and selective hydrogenation of CO₂ to ethylene and propene by bifunctional catalysts. Catal. Sci. Technol. 7, 5602–5607 (2017).

CAS Article Google Scholar
54.
Gao, P. et al. Direct production of lower olefins from CO₂ conversion via bifunctional catalysis. ACS Catal. 8, 571–578 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
55.
Liu, X. et al. Selective transformation of carbon dioxide into lower olefins with a bifunctional catalyst composed of ZnGa₂O₄ and SAPO-34. Chem. Commun. 54, 140–143 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
56.
Chen, J. et al. Hydrogenation of CO₂ to light olefins on CuZnZr@(Zn-)SAPO-34 catalysts: Strategy for product distribution. Fuel 239, 44–52 (2019).

CAS Article Google Scholar
57.
Ni, Y. et al. Selective conversion of CO₂ and H₂ into aromatics. Nat. Commun. 9, 3457 (2018).

ADS PubMed PubMed Central Article CAS Google Scholar
58.
Jiao, F. et al. Selective conversion of syngas to light olefins. Science 351, 1065–1068 (2016). This paper presents an OX-ZEO catalyst with high selectivity towards light olefins that breaks through the limitation of the ASF model .

ADS CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
59.
Liu, X. et al. Effective and highly selective CO generation from CO₂ using a polycrystalline α-Mo₂C catalyst. ACS Catal. 7, 4323–4335 (2017).

CAS Article Google Scholar
60.
Posada-Perez, S. et al. Highly activeAu/δ-MoC and Cu/δ-MoC catalysts for the conversion of CO₂: The metal/C ratio as a key factor defining activity, selectivity, and stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 8269–8278 (2016).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
61.
Ma, Z. & Porosoff, M. D. Development of tandem catalysts for CO₂ hydrogenation to olefins. ACS Catal. 9, 2639–2656 (2019).

CAS Article Google Scholar
62.
Zhao, B., Liu, Y., Zhu, Z., Guo, H. & Ma, X. Highly selective conversion of CO₂ into ethanol on Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalyst with the assistance of plasma. J. CO ₂ Util. 24, 34–39 (2018).
63.
Kattel, S. et al. CO₂ hydrogenation over oxide-supported PtCo catalysts: the role of the oxide support in determining the product selectivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 7968–7973 (2016).

CAS Article Google Scholar
64.
Tsoukalou, A. et al. Structural evolution and dynamics of an In₂O₃ Catalyst for CO₂ hydrogenation to methanol: an operando XAS-XRD and in situ TEM study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 13497–13505 (2019). This paper displays the activation, stable performance, and deactivation of an In ₂ O ₃ catalyst for methanol synthesis by an operando examination .

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
65.
Liu, L. et al. Mechanistic study of Pd–Cu bimetallic catalysts for methanol synthesis from CO₂ hydrogenation. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 26287–26299 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar
66.
Ye, J., Liu, C., Mei, D. & Ge, Q. Active oxygen vacancy site for methanol synthesis from CO₂ hydrogenation on In2O3(110): a DFT study. ACS Catal. 3, 1296–1306 (2013).

CAS Article Google Scholar
67.
Tang, Q., Shen, Z., Russell, C. K. & Fan, M. Thermodynamic and kinetic study on carbon dioxide hydrogenation to methanol over a Ga₃Ni₅(111) surface: the effects of step edge. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 315–330 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
68.
Martínez-Suárez, L., Siemer, N., Frenzel, J. & Marx, D. Reaction network of methanol synthesis over Cu/ZnO nanocatalysts. ACS Catal. 5, 4201–4218 (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar
69.
Olsbye, U. et al. Conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons: how zeolite cavity and pore size controls product selectivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 5810–5831 (2012).

CAS Article Google Scholar
70.
Shi, J., Wang, Y., Yang, W., Tang, Y. & Xie, Z. Recent advances of pore system construction in zeolite-catalyzed chemical industry processes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 8877–8903 (2015).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
71.
Li, Z. et al. Highly selective conversion of carbon dioxide to aromatics over tandem catalysts. Joule 3, 1–14 (2019). This paper reports stable catalysts that achieve high selectivity towards aromatics and demonstrate the effect of H ₂ O and CO ₂ in promoting aromatics formation .

ADS Article Google Scholar
72.
Numpilai, T., Wattanakit, C., Chareonpanich, M., Limtrakul, J. & Witoon, T. Optimization of synthesis condition for CO₂ hydrogenation to light olefins over In₂O₃ admixed with SAPO-34. Energy Convers. Manag. 180, 511–523 (2019).

CAS Article Google Scholar
73.
Kangvansura, P. et al. Product distribution of CO₂ hydrogenation by K- and Mn-promoted Fe catalysts supported on N -functionalized carbon nanotubes. Catal. Today 275, 59–65 (2016).

CAS Article Google Scholar
74.
Chew, L. M. et al. Effect of nitrogen doping on the reducibility, activity and selectivity of carbon nanotube-supported iron catalysts applied in CO₂ hydrogenation. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 482, 163–170 (2014).

CAS Article Google Scholar
75.
Kattel, S., Liu, P. & Chen, J. G. Tuning selectivity of CO₂ hydrogenation reactions at the metal/oxide interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 9739–9754 (2017).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
76.
Zhang, J. et al. Promotion effects of Ce added Fe–Zr–K on CO₂ hydrogenation to light olefins. React. Kinet. Mech. Cat. 124, 575–585 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
77.
Numpilai, T. et al. Structure–activity relationships of Fe-Co/K-Al₂O₃ catalysts calcined at different temperatures for CO₂ hydrogenation to light olefins. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 547, 219–229 (2017).

CAS Article Google Scholar
78.
Wang, X. et al. Effect of preparation methods on the structure and catalytic performance of Fe–Zn/K catalysts for CO 2 hydrogenation to light olefins. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 26, 761–767 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
79.
Ishida, T. et al. Synthesis of higher alcohols by Fischer–Tropsch synthesis over alkali metal-modified cobalt catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 458, 145–154 (2013).

CAS Article Google Scholar
80.
Galvis, H. M. T. et al. Supported iron nanoparticles as catalysts for sustainable production of lower olefins. Science 335, 835–838 (2012).

ADS Article CAS Google Scholar
81.
Visconti, C. G. et al. CO₂ hydrogenation to lower olefins on a high surface area K-promoted bulk Fe-catalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 200, 530–542 (2017).

CAS Article Google Scholar
82.
Meiri, N. et al. Novel process and catalytic materials for converting CO₂ and H₂ containing mixtures to liquid fuels and chemicals. Faraday Discuss. 183, 197–215 (2015).

ADS CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
83.
Ramirez, A., Gevers, L., Bavykina, A., Ould-Chikh, S. & Gascon, J. Metal organic framework-derived iron catalysts for the direct hydrogenation of CO₂ to short chain olefins. ACS Catal. 8, 9174–9182 (2018). This paper illustrates K promotion effects in CO ₂ hydrogenation and the importance of MOF-derived heterogeneous catalysts .

CAS Article Google Scholar
84.
Martinelli, M. et al. CO₂ reactivity on Fe–Zn–Cu–KFischer–Tropsch synthesis catalysts with different K-loadings. Catal. Today 228, 77–88 (2014).

CAS Article Google Scholar
85.
Wang, W., Jiang, X., Wang, X. & Song, C. Fe–Cu bimetallic catalysts for selective CO₂ hydrogenation to olefin-rich C₂ ⁺ hydrocarbons. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57, 4535–4542 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
86.
Wang, J., You, Z., Zhang, Q., Deng, W. & Wang, Y. Synthesis of lower olefins by hydrogenation of carbon dioxide over supported iron catalysts. Catal. Today 215, 186–193 (2013).

CAS Article Google Scholar
87.
Mattia, D. et al. Towards carbon-neutral CO₂ conversion to hydrocarbons. ChemSusChem 8, 4064–4072 (2015).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
88.
Gupta, S., Jain, V. K. & Jagadeesan, D. Fine tuning the composition and nanostructure of Fe-Based core-shell nanocatalyst for efficient CO₂ hydrogenation. ChemNanoMat 2, 989–996 (2016).

CAS Article Google Scholar
89.
Wu, T. et al. Porous graphene-confined Fe-K as highly efficient catalyst for CO₂ direct hydrogenation to light olefins. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 10, 23439–23443 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
90.
Ding, J. et al. CO₂ hydrogenation to light olefins with high-performance Fe_0.30Co_0.15Zr_0.45K_0.10O_1.63. J. Catal. 377, 224–232 (2019). This paper reveals that both oxygen vacancies and surface hydroxyl groups play significant roles in adsorption and activation of CO ₂.

CAS Article Google Scholar
91.
Jiang, F., Liu, B., Geng, S., Xu, Y. & Liu, X. Hydrogenation of CO₂ into hydrocarbons: enhanced catalytic activity over Fe-based Fischer–Tropsch catalysts. Catal. Sci. Technol. 8, 4097–4107 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
92.
Wei, J. et al. Catalytic hydrogenation of CO₂ to isoparaffins over Fe-based multifunctional catalysts. ACS Catal. 8, 9958–9967 (2018). This paper reports a one-step high-yield synthesis of isoparaffins using Na-Fe ₃ O ₄ /HMCM-22 catalyst through CO ₂ modified Fischer-Tropsch mechanism .

CAS Article Google Scholar
93.
Cui, X. et al. Selective production of aromatics directly from carbon dioxide hydrogenation. ACS Catal.9, 3866–3876 (2019).

CAS Article Google Scholar
94.
Tarasov, A. L., Isaeva, V. I., Tkachenko, O. P., Chernyshev, V. V. & Kustov, L. M. Conversion of CO₂ into liquid hydrocarbons in the presence of a Co-containing catalyst based on the microporous metal-organic framework MIL-53(Al). Fuel Process. Technol. 176, 101–106 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
95.
Isaeva, V. I. et al. Fischer-Tropsch synthesis over MOF-supported cobalt catalysts (Co@MIL-53(Al). Dalton Trans. 45, 12006–12014 (2016).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
96.
Shi, Z. et al. Effect of alkali metals on the performance of CoCu/TiO₂ catalysts for CO₂ hydrogenation to long-chain hydrocarbons. Chin. J. Catal. 39, 1294–1302 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
97.
He, Z. et al. Synthesis of liquid fuel via direct hydrogenation of CO₂. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 12654–12659 (2019).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
98.
He, Z. et al. Water-enhanced synthesis of higher alcohols from CO₂ hydrogenation over a Pt/Co₃O₄ catalyst under milder conditions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 737–741 (2016).

CAS Article Google Scholar
99.
Li, S. et al. Effect of iron promoter on structure and performance of K/Cu–Zn catalyst for higher alcohols synthesis from CO₂ hydrogenation. Catal. Lett. 143, 345–355 (2013).

CAS Article Google Scholar
100.
Wang, L. et al. Selective hydrogenation of CO₂ to ethanol over cobalt catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 6104–6108 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
101.
Ko, J., Kim, B.-K. & Han, J. W. Density functional theory study for catalytic activation and dissociation of CO₂ on bimetallic alloy surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 3438–3447 (2016).

CAS Article Google Scholar
102.
Willauer, H. D. et al. Modeling and kinetic analysis of CO₂ hydrogenation using a Mn and K-promoted Fe catalyst in a fixed-bed reactor. J. CO ₂ Util. 3-4, 56–64 (2013).
103.
Nakhaei Pour, A., Housaindokht, M. R. & Monhemi, H. A new LHHW kinetic model for CO₂ hydrogenation over an iron catalyst. Prog. React. Kinet. Mec. 41, 159–169 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar
104.
Gunasooriya, G. T. K. K., van Bavel, A. P., Kuipers, H. P. C. E. & Saeys, M. Key role of surface hydroxyl groups in C–O activation during Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. ACS Catal. 6, 3660–3664 (2016).

CAS Article Google Scholar
105.
Owen, R. E., Mattia, D., Plucinski, P. & Jones, M. D. Kinetics of CO₂ hydrogenation to hydrocarbons over Iron-Silica catalysts. ChemPhysChem 18, 3211–3218 (2017).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
106.
Riedel, T. et al. Fischer-Tropsch on iron with H₂/CO and H₂/CO₂ as synthesis gases: the episodes of formation of the Fischer-Tropsch regime and construction of the catalyst. Top. Catal. 26, 41–54 (2003).

CAS Article Google Scholar
107.
Su, T. et al. Density functional theory study on the interaction of CO₂ with Fe₃O₄ (111) surface. Appl. Surf. Sci. 378, 270–276 (2016).

ADS CAS Article Google Scholar
108.
Nie, X. et al. Mechanistic insight into C–C coupling over Fe–Cu bimetallic catalysts in CO₂ hydrogenation. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 13164–13174 (2017).

CAS Article Google Scholar
109.
Nie, X. et al. DFT insight into the effect of potassium on the adsorption, activation and dissociation of CO₂ over Fe-based catalysts. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 14694–14707 (2018).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
110.
Bonura, G. et al. Catalytic behaviour of a bifunctional system for the one step synthesis of DME by CO₂ hydrogenation. Catal. Today 228, 51–57 (2014).

CAS Article Google Scholar
111.
Frusteri, F. et al. Stepwise tuning of metal-oxide and acid sites of CuZnZr-MFI hybrid catalysts for the direct DME synthesis by CO₂ hydrogenation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 176-177, 522–531 (2015).

CAS Article Google Scholar
112.
Fujiwara, M., Satake, T., Shiokawa, K. & Sakurai, H. CO₂ hydrogenation for C₂₊ hydrocarbon synthesis over composite catalyst using surface modified HB zeolite. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 179, 37–43 (2015).

CAS Article Google Scholar
113.
Graça, I. et al. CO₂ hydrogenation into CH₄ on NiHNaUSY zeolites. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 147, 101–110 (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar
114.
Olsbye, U. Single-pass catalytic conversion of syngas into olefins via methanol. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 7294–7295 (2016).

CAS Article Google Scholar
115.
Boreriboon, N., Jiang, X., Song, C. & Prasassarakich, P. Fe-based bimetallic catalysts supported on TiO₂ for selective CO₂ hydrogenation to hydrocarbons. J. CO ₂ Util. 25, 330–337 (2018).
116.
Choi, Y. H. et al. Sodium-containing spinel zinc ferrite as a catalyst precursor for the selective synthesis of liquid hydrocarbon fuels. ChemSusChem 10, 4764–4770 (2017).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
117.
Yue, H. et al. A copper-phyllosilicate core-sheath nanoreactor for carbon-oxygen hydrogenolysis reactions. Nat. Commun. 4, 2339–2346 (2013).

ADS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
118.
Gao, Y., Liu, S., Zhao, Z., Tao, H. & Sun, Z. Heterogeneous catalysis of CO₂ hydrogenation to C₂₊ products. Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 34, 858–872 (2018).

CAS Google Scholar
119.
Liu, J. et al. Direct transformation of carbon dioxide to value-added hydrocarbons by physical mixtures of Fe₅C₂ and K-Modified Al₂O₃. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57, 9120–9126 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
120.
Liu, J. et al. Pyrolyzing ZIF-8 to N-doped porous carbon facilitated by iron and potassium for CO₂ hydrogenation to value-added hydrocarbons. J. CO ₂ Util. 25, 120–127 (2018).
121.
Liu, J. et al. Fe-MOF-derived highly active catalysts for carbon dioxide hydrogenation to valuable hydrocarbons. J. CO ₂ Util. 21, 100–107 (2017).

CAS Article Google Scholar
122.
Geng, S., Jiang, F., Xu, Y. & Liu, X. Iron-based Fischer-Tropsch synthesis for the efficient conversion of carbon dioxide into isoparaffins. ChemCatChem 8, 1303–1307 (2016).

CAS Article Google Scholar
123.
Choi, Y. H. et al. Carbon dioxide Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: a new path to carbon-neutral fuels. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 202, 605–610 (2017).

CAS Article Google Scholar
124.
Pei, Y. P. et al. High alcohols synthesis via Fischer-Tropsch reaction at cobalt metal/carbide interface. ACS Catal. 5, 3620–3624 (2015).

CAS Article Google Scholar
125.
Dutcher, B. et al. Use of nanoporous FeOOH as a catalytic support for NaHCO₃ decomposition aimed at reduction of energy requirement of Na₂CO₃/NaHCO₃ based CO₂ separation technology. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 15532–15544 (2011).

CAS Article Google Scholar
126.
Wu, Y. et al. First-principles and experimental studies of [ZrO(OH)^]+ or ZrO(OH)₂ for enhancing CO₂ desorption kinetics – imperative for significant reduction of CO₂ capture energy consumption. J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 17671–17681 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
127.
Ruiz-Morales, J. C. et al. Three dimensional printing of components and functional devices for energy and environmental applications. Energ. Environ. Sci. 10, 846–859 (2017). This paper reviews the progress and future prospects of 3D printing for energy and environmental applications .

CAS Article Google Scholar
128.
Tubío, C. R. et al. 3D printing of a heterogeneous copper-based catalyst. J. Catal. 334, 110–115 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar
129.
Li, Y. H. et al. Rational design and preparation of hierarchical monoliths through 3D printing for syngas methanation. J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 5695–5702 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
130.
Michorczyk, P., Hedrzak, E. & Wegrzyniak, A. Preparation of monolithic catalysts using 3D printed templates for oxidative coupling of methane. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 18753–18756 (2016).

CAS Article Google Scholar
131.
Thakkar, H. et al. 3D-printed zeolite monoliths for CO₂ removal from enclosed environments. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 27753–27761 (2016).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
132.
Gómez-Bombarelli, R. Reaction: the near future of artificial intelligence in materials discovery. Chemistry 4, 1189–1190 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar
133.
Cai, W., de la Piscina, P. R., Toyir, J. & Homs, N. CO₂ hydrogenation to methanol over CuZnGa catalysts prepared using microwave-assisted methods. Catal. Today 242, 193–199 (2015).

CAS Article Google Scholar
134.
Asghari, S., Haghighi, M. & Taghavinezhad, P. Plasma-enhanced dispersion of Cr₂O₃ over ceria-doped MCM-41 nanostructured catalyst used in CO₂ oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 279, 165–177 (2019).

CAS Article Google Scholar
135.
Yahyavi, S. R., Haghighi, M., Shafiei, S., Abdollahifar, M. & Rahmani, F. Ultrasound-assisted synthesis and physicochemical characterization of Ni–Co/Al₂O₃–MgO nanocatalysts enhanced by different amounts of MgO used for CH₄/CO₂ reforming. Energ. Convers. Manag. 97, 273–281 (2015).

CAS Article Google Scholar
136.
Wang, L., Yi, Y., Guo, H. & Tu, X. Atmospheric pressure and room temperature synthesis of methanol through plasma-catalytic hydrogenation of CO₂. ACS Catal. 8, 90–100 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar
137.
Nayebzadeh, H., Haghighi, M., Saghatoleslami, N., Tabasizadeh, M. & Yousefi, S. Fabrication of carbonated alumina doped by calcium oxide via microwave combustion method used as nanocatalyst in biodiesel production: Influence of carbon source type. Energ. Convers. Manag. 171, 566–575 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
138.
Khoja, A. H., Tahir, M. & Amin, N. A. S. Cold plasma dielectric barrier discharge reactor for dry reforming of methane over Ni/ɤ-Al₂O₃-MgO nanocomposite. Fuel Process. Technol. 178, 166–179 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
139.
Goldsmith, B. R., Esterhuizen, J., Liu, J.-X., Bartel, C. J. & Sutton, C. Machine learning for heterogeneous catalyst design and discovery. AIChE J. 64, 2311–2323 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
140.
Timoshenko, J., Lu, D., Lin, Y. & Frenkel, A. I. Supervised machine-learning-based determination of three-dimensional structure of metallic nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 5091–5098 (2017).

PubMed Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar
141.
Zahrt, A. F. et al. Prediction of higher-selectivity catalysts by computer-driven workflow and machine learning. Science 363, eaau5631 (2019). This paper reports a computationally guided workflow for chiral catalyst selection that is significant for asymmetric reaction development .

CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
142.
Hajjar, Z., Khodadadi, A., Mortazavi, Y., Tayyebi, S. & Soltanali, S. Artificial intelligence modeling of DME conversion to gasoline and light olefins over modified nano ZSM-5 catalysts. Fuel 179, 79–86 (2016).

CAS Article Google Scholar
143.
Kitchin, J. R. Machine learning in catalysis. Nat. Catal. 1, 230–232 (2018).

Article Google Scholar
144.
Ulissi, Z. W., Medford, A. J., Bligaard, T. & Norskov, J. K. To address surface reaction network complexity using scaling relations machine learning and DFT calculations. Nat. Commun. 8, 14621 (2017).

ADS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
145.
Wang, P., Zha, F., Yao, L. & Chang, Y. Synthesis of light olefins from CO₂ hydrogenation over (CuO-ZnO)-kaolin/SAPO-34 molecular sieves. Appl. Clay Sci. 163, 249–256 (2018).

CAS Article Google Scholar
146.
Wang, Y. et al. Rationally designing bifunctional catalysts as an efficient strategy to boost CO₂ hydrogenation producing value-added aromatics. ACS Catal. 9, 895–901 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar
147.
Zhang, J. et al. Selective formation of light olefins from CO₂ hydrogenation over Fe–Zn–K catalysts. J. CO ₂ Util. 12, 95–100 (2015).
148.
Sun, Y., Yang, G., Wen, C., Zhang, L. & Sun, Z. Artificial neural networks with response surface methodology for optimization of selective CO₂ hydrogenation using K-promoted iron catalyst in a microchannel reactor. J. CO ₂ Util. 24, 10–21 (2018).
149.
Liu, S., Zhou, H., Song, Q. & Ma, Z. Synthesis of higher alcohols from CO₂ hydrogenation over Mo–Co–K sulfide-based catalysts. J. Taiwan. Inst. Chem. Eng. 76, 18–26 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar
150.
Bai, S. et al. Highly active and selective hydrogenation of CO₂ to ethanol by ordered Pd-Cu nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 6827–6830 (2017). This paper reports an ordered Pd ₂ Cu/P25 catalyst for CO ₂ hydrogenation to ethanol through boosting *CO hydrogenation to *HCO .

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the China Scholarship Council (File no. 201704910592), the "Strategic Priority Research Program" of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA21020800), and University of Wyoming.

Author information

Author notes

These authors contributed equally: Run-Ping Ye, Jie Ding, Weibo Gong.

Affiliations

Departments of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, 82071, USA

Run-Ping Ye, Jie Ding, Weibo Gong, Christopher K. Russell & Maohong Fan
Key Laboratory of Coal to Ethylene Glycol and Its Related Technology, Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350002, China

Run-Ping Ye, Qiaohong Li & Yuan-Gen Yao
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

Run-Ping Ye
School of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210094, P.R. China

Jie Ding & Qin Zhong
Department of Chemical Engineering, Brigham Young University, 330 EB, Provo, UT, 84602, USA

Morris D. Argyle
State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, P.R. China

Yujun Wang
Departments of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, 94305, CA, USA

Christopher K. Russell
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China

Zhenghe Xu
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Mason Building, 790 Atlantic Drive, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA

Armistead G. Russell & Maohong Fan
School of Energy Resources, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, 82071, USA

Maohong Fan

Contributions

R.Y., J.D., and W.G. were responsible for preparing the whole paper; R.Y., J.D., W.G., and Q.L. contributed to the figure designing and drawing as well as comparisons of different types of reaction mechanisms; M.A. and C.R. contributed to the understanding of the intermediate formation and catalysis mechanisms involved in the paper; Q.Z., Y.W., Z.X., A.R. contributed to the understanding of the effects of catalyst structure on CO₂ conversion and product selectivity, M.F. and Y.Y. are the initiators, designers, and leaders of the work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Maohong Fan or Yuan-Gen Yao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, RP., Ding, J., Gong, W. et al. CO₂ hydrogenation to high-value products via heterogeneous catalysis. Nat Commun 10, 5698 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13638-9

Download citation

Received: 28 March 2019
Accepted: 18 November 2019
Published: 13 December 2019
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13638-9

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

What Is Proctozone Hc 2.5 Cream Used for

Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-13638-9

Walton Barrispinks

What Is Proctozone Hc 2.5 Cream Used for

Abstract

Introduction